As psychologists say, people often talk not to other people but to their projections they hang on others.

At the center of the default-systems of the founders' brains at different stages are different primary benchmarks.

For some of them, the persuasion that the main thing in a start-up is the idea itself never transforms into the understanding that this idea should meet the requirements of reality.

The fact that money itself is an opportunity for implementing the idea and rapid business growth is often overlooked.

It also happens that the role of an investor is not only devalued but also appears “demonic.”

We encounter the same devaluation of the role of technical implementation. But we have also seen many sad endings to such startups.

If a feeling of devaluation arises, which is annoying, then this feeling is a marker that you need to decide whether you are ready to enter into a “tug-of-war” relationship at all.

And will there be any financial success for such founders?

But who knows, maybe their mission is simply to improve the world?

Perhaps we are also wrong with our orientation towards financial success and technical solutions?

As old as time itself, and again compromises are required for the sake of progress.

Although everyone has the right to refuse if the case is particularly egregious.

Take care. :)